Thuy-My Le1*, Els van Hoffen110, Ischa Kummeling12, James Potts2, Barbara K Ballmer-Weber3, Carla AFM Bruijnzeel-Koomen1, Ans FM Lebens1, Jonas Lidholm4, Titia M Lindner1, Alan Mackie5, EN Clare Mills6, Ronald van Ree7, Stefan Vieths8, Montserrat Fernández-Rivas9, Peter G Burney2 and André C Knulst1
Abstract (provisional)
Background It is unknown whether food allergy (FA) in an unselected population is comparable to those from an outpatient clinic population.
Objective To discover if FA in a random sample from the Dutch community is comparable to that of outpatients.
Methods This study was part of the Europrevall-project. A random sample of 6600 adults received a questionnaire. Those with symptoms to one of 24 defined priority foods were tested for sIgE. Participants with a positive case history and elevated sIgE were evaluated by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Outpatients with a suspicion of FA were evaluated by questionnaire, sIgE and DBPCFC.
Results In the community, severe symptoms were reported less often than in outpatients (39.3% vs. 54.3%). Participants in the community were less commonly sensitized to any of the foods. When selecting only those with a probable FA (i.e. symptoms of priority food and elevation of sIgE to the respective food), no major differences were observed with respect to severity, causative foods, sensitization and DBPCFC between the groups.
Conclusion In the Netherlands, there are large differences in self-reported FA between community and outpatients. However, Dutch community and outpatients with a probable FA do not differ with respect to severity, causative foods, sensitization and DBPCFC-outcome.
Objective To discover if FA in a random sample from the Dutch community is comparable to that of outpatients.
Methods This study was part of the Europrevall-project. A random sample of 6600 adults received a questionnaire. Those with symptoms to one of 24 defined priority foods were tested for sIgE. Participants with a positive case history and elevated sIgE were evaluated by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Outpatients with a suspicion of FA were evaluated by questionnaire, sIgE and DBPCFC.
Results In the community, severe symptoms were reported less often than in outpatients (39.3% vs. 54.3%). Participants in the community were less commonly sensitized to any of the foods. When selecting only those with a probable FA (i.e. symptoms of priority food and elevation of sIgE to the respective food), no major differences were observed with respect to severity, causative foods, sensitization and DBPCFC between the groups.
Conclusion In the Netherlands, there are large differences in self-reported FA between community and outpatients. However, Dutch community and outpatients with a probable FA do not differ with respect to severity, causative foods, sensitization and DBPCFC-outcome.
The complete article is available as a provisional PDF. The fully formatted PDF and HTML versions are in production. |
No comments:
Post a Comment